-
“Findings of the Tribunal 49 The applicant has raised a plea of illegality of Article 6(2) of the GIP in the light of Article 85(1) of the CEOS in support of the claim for annulment of the non-renewal decision. 50 As provided for in Article 85(1) of the CEOS, ‘[t]he contracts of contract staff referred to in Article 3a [of the […]
-
12 Jun '15
Case T-296/12: notion of a “regulatory act”; exercise of implementing powers conferred to the Commission; a regulatory act to be challengeable must directly affect the legal situation of the applicant and, secondly, it must leave no discretion to its addressees, which are entrusted with the task of implementing it, such implementation being purely automatic and […]
-
According to the PROTOCOL No 29 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union “ON THE SYSTEM OF PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN THE MEMBER STATES”, in view of the fact that the system of public broadcasting in the Member States is directly related to the democratic, social and cultural needs of each society and […]
-
06 Apr '15
Publicité clandestine: l’absence de rémunération lors de sa diffusion n’exclue pas son caractère intentionnel La Cour appelée à répondre à une question préjudicielle posée par le Conseil d’Etat grec estime que l’existence d’une rémunération ne constitue pas un élément pouvant exclure le caractère intentionnel d’une publicité clandestine. Selon la Cour, une telle interprétation risquerait de compromettre la finalité […]
-
29 Nov '14La Cour annule partiellement l’arrêt du Tribunal concernant l’enregistrement du signe « Bud » en tant que marque communautaire et renvoie l’affaire au Tribunal pour une nouvelle décision…
- Tags:
- clone
- data protection
- gmo
- pesticide
-
European Union Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding says she will introduce stringent privacy rules to protect users of Internet social networking sites.
-
29 Nov '14
Nouveaux produits alimentaires : la guerre des clones.
Après près de trois ans de négociations sur la question du règlement sur les nouveaux aliments, la législation est abandonnée après l’échec des négociations entre Conseil et Parlement dans la nuit du 28 au 29 mars dernier -
20 Sep '14
Three arguments against the idea that a plea of illegality raised for the first time in an action should be declared inadmissible solely on the ground that it has not been raised in the complaint JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber) 18 September 2014 (*) (Civil service — ECB staff — Access of ECB […]
-
F-34/14: The general implementing rules cannot lawfully, by way of explaining more fully a clear term of the Staff Regulations, reduce the scope of those regulations or of the CEOS or lay down rules which derogate from hierarchically superior provisions, such as the provisions of the Staff Regulations or the CEOS or general principles of […]
-
F-26/12: The rule of correspondence, according to article 91 SR, between the complaint and the application that follows under the angle of the principles of effective judicial protection and legal principle; failing to consult the Staff Committee prior to the adoption of the rules applicable to requests from ECB staff, the ECB infringed paragraphs 48 […]
"I say I know one thing: that I know nothing.
That, indeed makes me more knowledgeable than anybody else"
- Socrates -
News & Events
Pappas & Associates
- Pappas & Associates, Rue Stevin 49-51, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- contact@pappaslaw.eu
- +32-2-231 57 04
- +32-2-231 57 08
Recent cases
European Court of Human Rights : ECHR 46862/14, ECHR 46819/14, ECHR 30287/14, ECHR 23544/14, ECHR 5485/14, ECHR76530/13, ECHR 68918/13, ECHR 59003/13, ECHR 57424/13, ECHR 39173/13, ECHR 39165/13, ECHR 32194/13, ECHR 23542/13, ECHR 53601/12, ECHR 48499/12, ECHR 18096/12, CHR 1317/07, ECHR 3735/06
European Commission (Competition) : C 2015/078217, C 2015/071997, SA.39119 (2014-CP), SA. 32060 (2014/NN), SA 35191 (20121CP), C(2011)3504, C 16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09), COMP/B1-39826/2010
Conseil d’Etat and Symvoulio tis Epikrateias : ΣτΕ 469/2012, Conseil d’Etat, arrêt nº 221.250 du 30 octobre 2012, ΣτΕ (ΕΑ) 259/2012, ΣτΕ (ΕΑ) 256-257/2012, ΣτΕ (ΕΑ) 254/2012, Conseil d’Etat arrêt nº 211.866 du 9 mars 2011, ΣτΕ 1786/2010
Court of Justice of the European Union : C-131/15 P, T-484/15, T-351/15, T-306/15, T-104/15, F-68/15, Τ-791/14, T-787/14 P, F-93/14, F-77/14, F-69/14, F-35/14, F-34/14, C-673/13 P, T-653/13, T-338/13, T-73/13, T-58/13, T-57/13, T-44/13, T-29/13, F-117/13, T-403/12, T-296/12, -192/12, T-36/12, T-14/12, F-137-138-139/12, F-26/12, T-635/11, T-422/11, T-419/11, T-317/11 P, T-59/11, F-124/11, F-87/11, F-24/10 RA, C-362/09 P, T-164/09, T-384/08, T-43/07 P, F-143/07, F-128-129/07, C-521/06 P, T-94/05 RENV II, T-94/05, F-100/05, T-471/04
T-298/20: Civil service- Legal value of Reporting Officer’s Practical dossier – Health problems and duty of care
Staff Regulations: the rule of correspondence between the complaint and the application
AMD Fusion APU Era Begins
The Reform of the data protection legal framework
The Netherlands Dances the Two-Step With Its New Telecom Law : Net-Neutrality and Online Advertisers Learn the Steps
Second Assessment of the Implementation of the Safer Networking Principles
Education and Employment Under the Europe 2020 Strategy
Google and the credibility of EU data protection laws
Is Microsoft ruling an example of European protectionism ?
A law with unintended consequences