F-34/14: The general implementing rules cannot lawfully, by way of explaining more fully a clear term of the Staff Regulations, reduce the scope of those regulations or of the CEOS or lay down rules which derogate from hierarchically superior provisions, such as the provisions of the Staff Regulations or the CEOS or general principles of law; Article 6(2) of the GIP restricts the scope of Article 85(1) of the CEOS in so far as it introduces a supplementary condition for the renewal of a contract as a member of the contract staff within the meaning of Article 3a of the CEOS which is not provided for in the CEOS and which hinders the exercise of the discretion conferred on the administration, without such a restriction being objectively justifiable in the interests of the service.
“Green Super Tuesday” at the Parliament with all -inclusive environment agenda
Health claims
F-34/14: Agency’s internal decisions of general scope versus Staff Regulations; justifications submitted for the first time during the proceedings cannot be taken into account.
Privacy and Data Protection
Data Protection in the Field of Pesticides
Annual dialogue and fixation of objectives substantial formalities of annual evaluations
Data protection policy of the European Union and the recent milestone decision of the Court of Justice
Public service contracts – Tendering procedure
The Google Commitments – how undue diversion of Internet traffic can be abusive?
C-673/13 P: Access to documents of the institutions – Concept of ‘information relating to emissions into the environment’ versus business secrets